Jacob Williams
Tuesday, 21st April, 2015

Inherent vices

Inherent vices

The list of possible runners in the vice-chairmanship race at next month’s county council AGM is drawing much speculation in the Kremlin on Cleddau.

For those unfamiliar with the process, full council elects a vice-chairman at every AGM, who, after serving a twelve-month apprenticeship, automatically becomes the chairman at the following year’s AGM without the possibility of a contest.

The current vice-chair is Narberth’s Cllr. Wynne Evans. At the upcoming AGM, on 15th May, Cllr. Evans will succeed the outgoing chairman, Cllr. Tom Richards, creating a vice-chair vacancy which will be filled by a secret ballot of councillors there and then.

This year’s vice-chair election has a special significance because, save for the intervention of nature, it’s the last time this council term that the winner can guarantee they’ll be in a position to assume their automatic chairmanship the following year.

The councillor elected vice-chair at the 2016 AGM will have to overcome the 2017 county council election if they’re to reach their destiny.

Failure to survive the public’s dalliance with the ballot box in 2017 – which is certainly not an unthinkable prospect – would deal the 2016 vice-chair’s ambitions a terminal blow, so one can perhaps understand why this year’s race is so hotly contested.

The honour has only ever been held by loyalists of the ruling independent party. Under the leadership of former council leader Maurice Hughes they even ran their own internal selection process by way of a postal ballot, following which the losers shook hands and united behind their chosen guy or gal for a certain victory at the AGM.

More often than not the ruling group’s official candidate stood as vice-chair on the agenda papers unopposed, but since the 2012 AGM – following the most recent council election – the IPPG’s official nominee has been contested by the opposition every time.

The first lamb to the slaughter during the current council term was Labour’s Cllr. Tom Tudor. Then in both 2013 and 2014 it was Cllr. Phil Baker, unaffiliated. Tom and Phil proved no match for IPPG stalwarts Cllrs. Arwyn Williams, Tom Richards and Wynne Evans respectively, but this year things could be a bit different.

The hot topic on the gossip front at County Hall right now is how the IPPG are clambering over each other to secure their party’s ‘official’ nomination. Some of us are even entertaining the possibility that the vice-chair ballot paper at this year’s AGM could contain multiple IPPG contenders.

When asked in the County Hall tea room whose names had been touted as potential vice-chair runners this morning, a senior ruling party figure said: “I think more group members have said they’d like to stand for it than those who haven’t!”

It’s high time a woman got her hands on the oak gavel, say some. Which has led to speculation that Solva’s Cllr. Lyn Jenkins may be considering her prospects in the popular vote.

None of the regular sources give Lyn a shred of hope, one even ranked her chances ‘somewhere between the old duffer’s and the young upstart’s!’ – so gamblers would do well to speculate elsewhere.

Ever since she unexpectedly stepped down as chair of the authority’s licensing committee last year, Monkton representative Cllr. Pearl Llewellyn’s made no attempt to hide her desire to become the county’s first lady.

Pearl the girl’s bid has been dubbed by the nerdier Kremlin politicos as somewhat of a slow-burning grassroots campaign than a brash ‘in-yer-face’ affair.

Following well-timed and candid revelations that she’ll step down at the next election, Pearl’s chairmanship – if she’s successful – will be seen by the traditionalists as a fitting bookend to a long county council service dating back to 1999.

Our girl Pearl’s county-wide appeal may have suffered a blow at last week’s extraordinary council meeting on north county secondary school reorganisation when she suggested – yes, out loud – that the south must come first.

Whether her refreshing brand of back yard diplomacy will hold her back from the IPPG’s official nomination remains to be seen, but she’s still one to watch, regardless.

Why? Because usually reliable sources say Pearl isn’t too bothered if she loses out in the official IPPG selection process, and intends to put her name forward for vice-chair come-what-may.

She’s even threatened many a time to leave the IPPG and says she has pre-signed group resignation papers on standby in her handbag. A handbag, which, following her resignation as licensing chair (SRA £9k) has been considerably lighter.

The more canny observers suggest that, if Pearl’s candidature goes up in smoke and she starts threatening to leave the IPPG again, then the person she stepped aside for as licensing committee chair – the party’s uber-sycophant Cllr. Daphne Bush – could be demoted to the cattle class carriage whence she came so Pearl can make her licensing chairmanship return.

It’s definitely the council chair she hankers over, not the licensing chair, but in some shape or form JW’s certain Pearl’s handbag will play its part.

Meanwhile, the longest declared candidacy of the lot belongs to the self-proclaimed “Voice of Johnston,” Cllr. Ken Rowlands.

After ditching the Labour party in 2008 (and then signing up to the ruling ‘independent’ party) Cllr. Rowlands found himself on the receiving end of a cabinet post, earning the retired deputy headmaster one of the authority’s juiciest special responsibility allowances going.

Ken’s long journey on the gravy train came to an abrupt end last autumn when his leader, Cllr. Jamie Adams, turfed him out of the first class carriage. Ever since, “The Voice of Johnston” has cut a lonely figure in the corridors of power, where, ironically, he finds himself a man without power for the first time in many a year.

Following his cabinet dismissal, a bitter Ken has lamented the fact that his talents aren’t being put to use to benefit the county – and what better use for those talents than keeping a chamber of sixty rowdy reps in order?

But it would seem “The Voice of Johnston” has a mountain to climb if he’s to realise his hopes of trading up to “The Voice of Pembrokeshire,” because Ken isn’t among the frontrunners by any stretch.

For months Ken’s been canvassing support from all quarters – ranging from gentle encounters with anyone who’ll listen to him in the tea room to straight-out-with-it telephone calls.

It seems I’m one of the only ones Ken hasn’t spoken to – I can’t think why – because other councillors have been recounting his efforts to canvass their support for ages. Ken may not have approached me for support, but he did hold a door open for me some weeks ago, so I don’t think he’s allowed his campaign to run into the buffers just yet.

A shock contender currently ‘considering’ a run – in his own words – is IPPG ultra-loyalist, Cllr. Mike James. If he does stand and wins, the member for St. Dogmaels will have to juggle many responsibilities as he’s also the current chairman of the national park authority.

Cllr. James will be seen as a safe pair of hands for the council’s leadership, who are said to be heavily supportive – indeed, key movers – of his candidacy. He’s got form when it comes to assuming the chair, so he may be a shoo-in yet again, but it remains to be seen if the rest of the council think Mike’s briefcase is already too overloaded.

As for an opposition candidate, there’s growing speculation that 2015 could be Cllr. Tony Brinsden’s year. Although it’s in its infancy – and is surrounded by questions of ‘will-he-won’t-he?’ – there’s an unmistakeable movement gathering apace behind the unaffiliated independent member for Amroth, who hasn’t actively been pursuing the role.

If Cllr. Brinsden can be persuaded to stand, the retired detective chief inspector could make a formidable contender, and as a recent past chair of the national park, the experience could stand him in good stead.

As the vice-chair is automatically elevated to chairman, the only thing we can say with absolute certainty is that the chairman coming out of next month’s AGM will be Cllr. Wynne Evans.

In the interests of openness and transparency, Cllr. Evans has made a pledge that he won’t attend his ruling group’s secret pre-meetings which regularly take place in the days ahead of full council meetings.

These gatherings can be lively affairs (see here also) where the issues coming up on the agendas are thrashed out behind closed doors and the party line is established privately, so as to avoid any public dissent or embarrassing spats among members in view of the webcam watched by the people they supposedly represent.

Cllr. Evans’ refusal to attend such tactical and partisan meetings is, of course, a welcome change. Better still, if Wynne really wants to be seen as completely impartial when presiding over council proceedings, he’d do well to follow the parliamentary custom by renouncing his IPPG membership and serving without affiliation to any group or party whatsoever.

Nominations for vice-chair have to be submitted ten clear days before the AGM, the list of candidates will subsequently be revealed upon the publication of the agenda, usually a week or so before the meeting.

Given the amount of clear interest in the role, it may not make much of a difference who wins or loses the IPPG’s ‘official’ nomination, but I’m told an IPPG get-together has been arranged next week for the party’s official vice-chair selection process.

As for the losers, observers would do well to remember that Jamie’s still got an unfilled cabinet post up his sleeve – a big mattress stuffed with enough to cushion even the heaviest of municipal setbacks. But only one of them!


21 Comments...

  • Vivien Stoddart

    Jacob, you are not alone. I, too, have not been solicited by the “Voice of Johnston.”

    Let’s not forget the legacy of education supremos Ken and his predecessor Cllr Huw George: that no Pembrokeshire secondary school is considered to be good and outstanding and that, collectively, the county’s secondary schools are currently ranked 16th in Wales compared to 8th on the deprivation index.

    Given his less than stellar performance as education boss, it is not difficult to explain The Voice’s failure to pick up the phone to canvass my support.

  • Malcolm Calver

    Viv, would you not agree that perhaps secondary schools in Pembrokeshire are having to remedy the poor standard of education that pupils receive at primary level in Pembrokeshire?

    I really do not believe that so called “deprivation” has anything to do with attainment, I would have thought it would have made a child more determined to succeed in education.

  • Jonathan Preston

    No call from Ken for me either. However it’s not surprising as he supported the plan to put a new council tip right next to the sensory garden of a nursing home next to my ward.

    Pearl on the other hand has been active. Coral gave me a great tip: look into the eyes of all IPPG contenders, the one with the most ‘£’s in them is sure to win!

  • Sealight

    Jacob, you say that “the honour has only ever been held by loyalists of the ruling independent party”. But you do them a disservice!

    Yes, during this time frame there were two independent parties but surely you should refer to them as the “Independent Party”, after all, the IPG and IPPG have both been a “Party” without portfolio, sorry manifesto, and collectively should be given the status of a proper noun!

  • Sealight, collectively they’re also proper Charlies.

  • Kate Becton

    Vivien, it is extremely concerning that there is not one secondary school in Pembrokeshire that is either good or outstanding. However, Malcolm, it is all very well saying that the standard in primary schools causes this and that children should be more determined to do well.

    I will, no doubt, be shot down in flames, but having had some experience in this area, I feel that parents in Pembrokeshire should get a grip. There are many children who attend primary school who cannot use a knife and fork, who cannot take themselves to the toilet, who have never seen a book, let alone read one, and this means that Pembrokeshire primary schools have to expend a lot of time and effort on ‘social skills’ for children, which then takes any sort of investment in children who do have skills – they are clearly ‘alright’.

    In my opinion, this goes back to the paternalistic attitude that still exists in Pembrokeshire – ‘Oh love them, we have to throw all our efforts and expenditure on children that do not have the support at home’ – those who do have the support can just get on with it.

    I have no idea whether schools in Pembrokeshire have members of staff who are responsible for clever/gifted children – I know that they do in England – perhaps Vivien you know. Perhaps this would not ‘be fair’ and we should make sure that every child is ‘average’ regardless of ability.

    I know this sounds like I am ranting, but I feel very strongly about this, we are letting our most able children down.

  • Tony Wilcox

    With a cabinet post up for grabs as well as vice chair plus licensing, I reckon the best way forward for Jamie is to conduct a sealed bid type auction to find out who can be bribed for the least amount.

    After all…we are in troubled times financially!

  • If, as reported, the incoming chairman Cllr Wynne Evans intends to avoid IPPG secret group meetings that would be a significant bonus for democracy.

    It has always struck me as bizarre that the supposedly impartial chairman should attend these pre-meeting meetings where the party’s tactics for dealing with the opposition are worked out. Cllr Evans should be applauded.

    The next step is for the chairman to cut all political ties during his year of office and sit as an unaffiliated member.

    That is what happens with the Speaker of the House of Commons and if it’s good enough for Parliament it’s surely good enough for PCC.

  • John Hudson

    Rather than “Buggins’ turn” it is now possible for the council to opt to have a presiding member, with or without a deputy and to appoint a civic chair, with or without a deputy to carry out ceremonial functions. (Local Government (Democracy) (Wales) Act 2013 Section 51).

    The Independent Remuneration Panel – the body that “fixes” the mandatory councillors’ salaries – has determined that councils may decide not to apply any recommended civic salary to the posts of civic head and/or a deputy.

    Civic salaries are to be determined by authorities on the basis of three recommended salary rates for the workload and responsibility depending on local activity. Thus it could decide that the basic councillor’s salary is sufficient, and the “honour” of representing the council is reward enough in itself.

    The IRP does not mention a salary for a presiding officer, if appointed. Presumably this “Speaker of the House” has to make do on his basic councillor’s salary.

  • Malcolm Calver

    Kate, I am afraid primary schools do pass on children to secondary schools without the level of education that is necessary at that level. I would agree with you that reckless parents who have children, but then fail to put the put enough effort into their upbringing, is a major problem and needs to be improved.

    The point I was making about so called “poverty” as an excuse was that if you are brought up in a family with limited income it would make you more determined to improve your lot in life. We also have to accept that some pupils have limited ability and cannot proceed because they do not have the necessary ability to progress.

    You will as a Labour Party member probably not agree with me but the rot set in when we ended grammar schools and brought in comprehensive education.

    During the last few weeks we have been bombarded with promises from national politicians promising to create more apprenticeships but sadly these are in what I would describe as semi skilled jobs.

    What hope is there when Ed Balls took ten seconds to answer the question what is 6 x 7 and the Conservative education spokesperson could not answer the question what is 11 x 12?

    To Jonathan Preston, Plaid Cymru, stick to the truth – it was not a council tip but a recycling facility.

    To Tony Wilcox, be thankful as two of the likely candidates are elected ex-Labour Party members.

  • Keanjo

    Malcolm, a tip by any other name would smell as sweet.

  • Welshman 23

    The vice chair position should be rotated between the different parties.

  • Brian

    Just to put some facts on the Pembrokeshire primary school standards, take a good look at http://mylocalschool.wales.gov.uk/ selecting ‘Primary’ and ‘Pembrokeshire’ as your search criteria.

    Not that strong a picture compared to the rest of Wales and a cursory inspection of the data seems to indicate that if you really want to set your children up for a fall send them to a Welsh medium school.

    No point in publicising the fact that you have the lowest council tax in Wales if people don’t have the numeracy and literacy skills to understand.

  • Morgi

    Kate, Preseli School is in the Welsh top ten of secondary schools in Wales. In a press release following the announcement, PCC’s cabinet member for education, Cllr Sue Perkins said “This magnificent achievement is testament to the hard work of staff and students”.

  • Martin Lewis

    Preseli school coming in the top ten of Welsh secondary schools is not necessarily attributable to the fact that it’s a Welsh medium school. In fact I’d say it’s very unlikely this is the reason and the odds are that it’s simply a coincidence.

    As for having the lowest council tax in Wales, I might be wrong but last time I saw a council statement regarding that it had been changed to “one of the lowest”. Maybe you can confirm Jacob?

  • Hi Martin, I don’t know if PCC has been knocked off the ‘lowest council tax in Wales’ perch.

    As many have said before, this badge of honour doesn’t mean much if the council’s services are subsidised by up-front fees which, in other authorities, may not be.

    Comparisons aren’t impossible. I recall being told (when I was a member of the environment overview and scrutiny committee) that even considering the fees of other councils in Wales, PCC compared favourably within environmental services.

    Then you get down to the respective popularities of services being compared, and the issue of whether they are fair comparisons arises.

    It’s not easy to be definitive – which may be why this ‘lowest council tax in Wales’ badge has stuck, and forms the IPPG’s motto.

  • John Hudson

    I wonder how many councils similarly benefit from a toll bridge and apply the “profits” (about £1.8m p.a.) from toll charges to reduce or subsidise their council tax requirement?

  • Keanjo

    The Cleddau bridge situation is quite interesting. When Nicholas Edwards was standing for MP one of his promises to Pembrokeshire was that he would remove the toll.

    He was elected and appointed Secretary of State for Wales, thus being in a good position to fulfil his promise. Of course he found that the building of the bridge was carried out under an Act of Parliament which he could not revoke so he introduced a condition that the outstanding loan was interest free, thus removing any advantage in repayment.

    The Director of Finance may be taking advantage of the arrangement by utilising the toll takings, in which case he is acting in our interest. Can any councillor verify the situation?

  • Dave Edwards

    John, the Cleddau Bridge is the only council toll bridge in Wales.

  • John Hudson

    The governing Dyfed Act 1965 provides that toll charges should be set at a level to produce not substantially more, nor substantially less, than is required to meet the “purposes” of the bridge. Further, toll receipts can only be used for the “purposes” of the bridge.

    The “purposes” of the bridge are legally defined in the 1965 Act, but do not include applying excess annual profits received from toll income to reduce council tax.

    Just how does the Council apply the legal requirements of the Dyfed Act 1965?

  • John Hudson

    Just to clarify, the 1965 Act that enabled the bridge to be built on a self financing basis was repealed and replaced by Part II of the Dyfed Act 1987.

    Essentially the detailed terms of the Acts are the same. The 1987 Act is the current governing Act.

  • Have your say...