Jacob Williams
Thursday, 15th May, 2014

Cabinet maker

Cabinet maker

At the extraordinary council meeting on the 1st May, Cllr. Paul Miller proposed to extend the brilliant webcasting facility currently covering full council meetings to include all committee meetings. It failed, without the support of even a single member of the tight-knit ruling ‘independent’ party.

Webcasting from the committee rooms would require £11,000 capital outlay for equipment, and there is still some Welsh Government grant money available to part-fund this. Even so, it was laid on pretty thickly to us councillors that times were very hard and belts were being tightened so there wasn’t enough in the coffers, especially when the additional ongoing running costs of £16,000 were factored in.

We were even threatened by the leader that some of the Pembrokeshire public would have to lose out on some sort of service if the proposal went ahead, no details though. There was, however, a suggestion that it would be more suitable to reconsider the idea in December after the year-long trial of the current council chamber-only setup is reviewed.

As regular reader and contributor John Hudson has observed, the ‘strapped-for-cash’ excuse often seems to be wheeled out against proposals that are otherwise opposed by the ruling cabal, but where a bare-faced “we don’t like the idea” would be suicidal and met with public outcry.

The webcasting facility for full council meetings has been a revelation – and as you’re reading this, there’s a good chance you’re the sort of person who already knows exactly how valuable it is.

Apart from Scleddau’s Owen James, all opposition councillors supported the idea, but it wasn’t enough to overturn every single member of the ruling ‘independent’ party present voting it down.

Check how your councillor voted, then read on:

Unaffiliated
Phil Baker
Tony Brinsden
Mike Evans
Tessa Hodgson
Phil Kidney
David Lloyd
Mike Stoddart
Vivien Stoddart
Jacob Williams

Plaid Cymru
Rod Bowen
Michael Williams

Conseravtive
David Bryan
David Howlett

Labour
Pat Davies
Alison Lee
Paul Miller
Gwilym Price
Tony Wilcox
Guy Woodham

Pembrokeshire Alliance
Bob Kilmister
Jonathan Nutting
Peter Stock

22

IPG
Jamie Adams
John Allen-Mirehouse
Daphne Bush
Mark Edwards
Wynne Evans
Lyndon Frayling
Huw George
Brian Hall
Paul Harries
Umelda Havard
Mike James
Lyn Jenkins
Michael John
Stephen Joseph
Keith Lewis
Rob Lewis
Pearl Llewellyn
Peter Morgan
Elwyn Morse
David Neale
Myles Pepper
Sue Perkins
David Pugh
David Rees
Tom Richards
Ken Rowlands
Rob Summons
Arwyn Williams
Steve Yelland

Unaffiliated
Owen James

30

No abstentions.

0


During the debate, council leader Cllr. Jamie Adams spoke of the confidence issues some councillors may have in a committee environment, faced with cameras filming their every word. Cllr. Wynne Evans also said he was concerned that public speakers who addressed committees – such as objectors to planning applications – could feel intimidated, and it might even discourage camera-shy people from coming in to observe meetings from the gallery. Boo hoo!

So a week and a day after the meeting where we were told in pretty clear terms the municipal piggy bank was stretched to squealing point, there was a bit of a shock in store for councillors sitting in their inboxes.

It was an email sent during the afternoon of the council’s AGM, timed well after proceedings had concluded and the last of the new chairman’s buffet reception sandwiches had been scoffed.

The email came from on high, telling us mere mortals that the leader was making an exciting announcement. The council’s cabinet was to increase in size by one member, from eight plus the leader to nine plus the leader.

Given the dire financial picture Cllr. Adams painted in refusing webcasting, it’s anybody’s guess how much ransacking he had to do in the County Hall sofa to cobble together his new cabinet colleague’s extra salary.

Farmers are often known for their thrift and resourcefulness, but even a genius with numbers like Huw George would be hard-pushed to explain how Cllr. Adams scraped together the requisite £16k special responsibility allowance from a cupboard we were told was bare just days before.

The “new look” cabinet sees “two new faces” and an old one exiting stage left. The reshuffle has brought about the demise of Cllr. Ken Rowlands, who’s sat at the top table for a solid six years. Before being defrocked, Cllr. Rowlands latterly headed up the education portfolio, which will now be assumed by Cllr. Sue Perkins in addition to her child safeguarding role.

Cllr. Rob Summons has made the big time, and from lowly backbencher is now the authority’s spokesperson for ‘planning and sustainability.’ Having won the Burton by-election in 2013, Cllr. Summons is the shortest-serving councillor of all, and has not once sat on the planning committee, so it’s not readily apparent how or where he acquired his planning nous. Then again, who ever said these appointments are made on merit?!

The other councillor to be elevated is Cllr. Keith Lewis, courtesy of a bizarre arrangement which must have come as quite a relief for Cllr. David Pugh.

You’ll remember earlier this year Cllr. Pugh made a botched attempt to downplay allegations of grant scheme fraud. His rebuttal, speaking as the responsible cabinet member, was proven to be based almost entirely on misinformation and outright falsehoods, for which he subsequently had to apologise and won JW’s 2013 Golden Donqui award, as voted by you.

He faced (and narrowly survived) a vote of no confidence for his nasty tirade, but not before he had his grant scheme responsibilities withdrawn by the leader and put in the safer hands of his cabinet colleague, Cllr. David Simpson.

Cllr. Pugh now has even fewer demands because the leader has hacked away at his cabinet responsibilities yet again. Cllr. Keith Lewis has traded his chairmanship of the economy overview and scrutiny committee to become the cabinet spokesperson for ‘communities and the volutary sector,’ which, you’ve guessed it, used to be in Cllr. Pugh’s brief.

Any more salami slicing by the leader and Cllr. Pugh is in danger of becoming Pembrokeshire’s very own minister without portfolio, though Cllr. Rowlands has quite a strong claim to that title already.

The email to councillors making the announcement tried to put a more positive spin on Cllr. Pugh’s situation, saying: “The arrival of Councillor Lewis (Crymych) in the Cabinet allows Councillor Pugh to concentrate his attention exclusively on Economy and Tourism.”

No official word yet if his salary has been adjusted to reflect the ever-reducing burdens on his attention!


27 Comments...

  • Keanjo

    Jacob, if they are as cash strapped as Jamie claims, why didn’t the eight agree to their SRAs being dropped by 1/9th to about £12,000 and then the budget provision would be unaltered by the creation of a new cabinet member?

  • Welshman 23

    The lunatics voted against the motion because they would get exposed, let’s be honest we are trying to push water up hill, the list of wrongdoings goes on and on. Everybody has tried to boot this council into shape, even the police have been called.

    Pensions, changing council minutes, employing more councillors for silly unwanted jobs, protection of our school children, four-year backdated travel expense payments, the list goes on…

    What it needs is a mass resignation from the parties in opposition.

    These people in charge are not fit for purpose, but they seem to be exempt from everything.

  • Andrew Lye

    It seems we now have a cabinet in which 1/6th of all councillors sit on it. And there is STILL no female cabinet member from the Independent part of the “coalition”. Why? Why does the Cabinet get bigger?

    With regards to webcasting, maybe the Council should write letters to those that made the decision with regards to the Chief Executive’s pension, asking them to repay all the monies this has incurred in making the decision and the costs incurred trying to uphold it. That money could then be used to fund the webcasting. After all, if those councillors made that decision that the WAG said was unlawful, why should we have to pay as Council Tax payers?

    You suggested the Chief Executive pays the pension money back to the Council, the onus is now on the Councillors to pay for their actions. Just a suggestion.

  • Andrew,

    I’m not quite sure what you mean about there being a ruling “coalition.”

    Pembrokeshire is strictly a one party state, always has been.

    The ‘independent’ party has total control, and a female cabinet member in Cllr. Sue Perkins, before that Anne Hughes.

  • Indepedant

    I’d like to know if True Blue Sue has actually been kicked out of the Labour Party yet?

  • Last week, I understand.

    Perkins, Hancock and Owens all got the boot.

  • Indepedant

    Well overdue.

  • Robin Wilson

    So, which service I wonder has suffered to fund the new cabinet member?

  • Welshman 23

    Robin, the cuts will not come from the top, it will be from services where people are too weak to complain.

    Have you read the goings on at the Pembroke Town Council meeting last evening?

  • Kate Becton

    Jacob – I am, at this point really losing the will to live. I have posted a comment on True Blue Sue in agreement with John Hudson, to the effect that, whilst we can understand your reluctance to form a Group, Pembrokeshire is being deprived of the most effective Cllrs. in positions where they could really make a difference – I hope that you could all reconsider.

    Looking at the post regarding webcasts I would make the following points:-

    1. If there are Councillors who would feel nervous about the public they represent listening to what they say, then they are in the wrong job, should resign immediately and retire to a darkened room.

    2. I remember that, when I proposed that protesters and supporters should be allowed to speak at Planning Meetings, the argument put forward against it was that there were some people who might not wish to speak at Planning meetings so it was unfair to allow it.

    My counter argument was that there were an awful lot of people who did not wish to stand for election as Cllrs., so in the interests of fairness it would be best not to hold any elections. Cllr. John Davies (then Leader) clearly saw the difficulty in upholding his argument and, after a lot of totally unnecessary fuss, it finally came to pass.

    3. I am appalled by the fact that we have a Cabinet Member for Planning who has never even sat on the Planning Committee (one of the really interesting Committees because of its complexity) – Jacob you were right and I was wrong – admittedly I have no idea who has the better credentials between Cllr. Bush and Cllr. Lee for the Chairmanship of the Licensing Committee – perhaps you do; but it does seem to have been done on ‘Party Lines’.

    4. Perhaps Jacob you could tell us how we can judge these appointments – perhaps how you do so? I am furious because both of these Committees hold so much power over people’s lives.

    5. The idea of Councillors having to provide Planning reasons for going against Officers’ recommendations makes one think that there is no point in the Planning Committee at all – in my opinion it’s a form of blackmail. The constant refrain is that it will cost money because people will appeal. Money isn’t a problem when it’s an ‘unlawful’ pension payments for officers, though.

    Enough from me for tonight; I am so angry – the answer OG is a couple of glasses of Merlot?? – only joking, maybe not.

  • Andrew Lye

    Coalition in that to get the majority, he had to bring in Hancock and Perkins. The PLUS part of the IPG to make it the IPPG.

  • Andrew, I don’t think your reference to a ‘coalition’ describes things accurately at all, even if you meant it in a loose sense.

    It implies an air of legitimacy to all other members of the IPPG apart from the ones you’ve named (and there are others you could have included, for instance, why not mention your own councillor, Ken Rowlands?)

    Apart from Rob Summons (who, pre-election made clear that he would be joining the IPPG if elected) every single member of the IPPG has been ‘brought in,’ as you put it, because they were all elected as ‘independent.’

    And the sentence above works just as well if the word ‘brought’ is spelt without the letter ‘r.’

  • Timetraveller

    Lack of money should be no excuse for the authority’s statutory obligations, no one will ever need to pay council tax again if they cite “lack of money”.

    This discussion is why all councillors should have some familiarity with the Green Book. There are 38,000 or so “Band D” or equivalent council tax payers in the county. On average in Wales they would expect to pay £250-300 a year more if they lived anywhere other than Pembs. It is laudable that this is so low, but it is not without waste.

    Kerr’s fees, £27,000 that’s about 70p per ratepayer.

    New cabinet appointment, say £15,000 – about 40p.

    Leader’s late expenses, £4,000 about 10p.

    All this is pocket money, but it adds up. More serious, if domicilary care was underfunded to the tune of £2.5 million, that would be £65.79. It’s fine not paying this money until you get old and need its services.

    Perhaps the CEO will need all the money he can lay his hands on for his retirement if he intends to spend it in Pembs. As it is look at the massive rise in care fees for the elderly, you WILL be cleaned out in old age in Pembs.

    The Green Book is not statute, but it should be telling councillors how far off the path and onto the grass they have wandered. It is not necessarily a socialist agenda, as great efforts are made to assess need, such as how many miles of road the county has and how much traffic to assess the element or IBA for roads for example.

    £16,000 for cameras seems a good investment to bring some accountability into council, especially given the high viewing figures for full council meetings.

    If you’re old or otherwise vulnerable you are probably already aware of the “results”, it’s the process you need to see.

  • Keanjo

    Timetraveller, don’t forget the council’s £1.75 million ‘loan’ that’s now been written off in exchange for a 3% stake in Bluestone.

  • In reference to an earlier comment I posted, I understand the process of kicking out said councillors from the Labour party has begun – it is not a quick process.

  • Dave Javu

    If the Council is so strapped for cash, I would hope that a reduction in the staggering £901,551.29 (yes, not far off £1 Million) spent purely on private taxis to convey children to and from schools in the county for the financial year 2012-2013 would be in order.

  • Indepedant

    Why stay in a party that you don’t support?!

  • Goldingsboy

    Presumably, the contributor signing in as Indepedant (sic), is a member of that bunch of intellectual giants, otherwise known as the IPG.

  • Timetraveller

    For Dave, I believe the maths works out at £23.72 per council tax payer for taxis. Keanjo, that is likewise an investment of £46.05, mind what’s 3% of nothing worth?

    Councils can talk millions without really meaning anything. The taxis are considered in the Green Book, at least transport costs are, presumably the authority calculate that as the most cost effective option. Blame Whitehall/Cardiff Bay there as they more or less pass that obligation on to the authority (and pay them accordingly).

    No obligation to fund Bluestone of course, nor pay top rates for staff and councillors.

    Presumably they might be buying an oil refinery next.

  • Indepedant

    I think you missed my (obvious) point Goldingsboy.

  • Keanjo

    Timetraveller, do you know anyone who would like to buy my share in Bluestone for £46.05? Maybe I should put it on eBay.

  • Paul Absalom

    I am sure it’s who you know not what you know. Always has been in PCC since we were given the chance to run our own county, pity untrustworthy people seem to have the power.

  • Welshman 23

    Are Pembrokeshire people ready for the UKIP revolution?

  • Nev Andrews

    Ideally placed I would have thought. There’s been plenty of time to get used to political masters who have no stated policies or manifesto, with one “look at me” in charge and a generally questionable (!) attitude to anything which comes from over a boundary to the east…

  • Nev Andrews

    PS – We’ll probably find that Jamie Adams will find a way to take credit for that too…

  • Powertothepeople

    I love watching the webcast, it’s a hoot. When I listen to some of the IPPG members it makes me want to cringe.

  • Powertothepeople

    Just saw BPJ on the news, it’s the first time I have heard him speak.

  • Have your say...